问HN：英伟达为什么假装他们的机器人不是遥控的？
当马斯克使用穿着机器人服装的演员或演示遥控机器人而不承认它们不是真实的时，我感到非常困惑。作为一名英国人，我想知道——在美国，这是否被视为无害的娱乐，即使它具有误导性？
这就像那些美国体育赛事的中场表演，"随机"的观众成员做一些奇怪的事情，但他们显然是演员。大多数人没有注意到，而那些注意到的人似乎也不在乎。
在欧洲，这种欺骗感觉像是一个红旗。我们期望有明确的界限：要么是概念，要么是原型，要么是成品。假装它是真实的会侵蚀信任。
总结一下：
美国的营销是否更习惯于模糊现实，而欧洲的营销则更重视透明度？
查看原文
When Musk used actors in robot suits or demoed remote-controlled robots without admitting they weren’t real, I was genuinely confused. As a Brit, I wonder—is this just accepted in the U.S. as harmless fun, even if it's misleading?<p>It’s like those American sports halftime shows where “random” crowd members do weird things, but they’re clearly actors. Most people don’t notice, and those who do don’t seem to care.<p>In Europe, that kind of deception feels like a red flag. We expect clear boundaries: either something’s a concept, a prototype, or a finished product. Pretending it’s real erodes trust.<p>TL;DR:
Is American marketing more comfortable with blurring reality, while European marketing prioritizes transparency?