我们为什么还需要一次又一次地证明事物？
我们一直在思考，人们需要多频繁地证明学位、证书或工作经历等信息，以及这种过程依然是多么繁琐。发送扫描件、PDF文件，请求大学或人力资源部门确认信息……这一切都很慢、很麻烦，而且容易被伪造。
如果有一种方法，可以以一种永远可验证的格式接收官方文件（如文凭或工作证明），而不是因为有人签署了PDF，而是因为发证机构本身在一个防篡改的系统中进行了注册，那会怎样？
这更像是互联网的一个认证层。你不需要“签署”任何东西，文件本身就能证明其有效性。而用户则保持控制权，决定谁可以查看哪些信息。
这让我们开始思考：
在证明证书或背景时，你个人在哪些方面遇到最多的困难？
如果有这样的方式，源机构直接支持其真实性，你会感到更舒适还是更不舒适？
如果这样的方式变得普遍，你最大的担忧是什么？
我们希望了解一个拥有发证机构验证文件的世界会是什么样子，以及人们是否真的想要这样的东西。期待听到其他人的看法。
查看原文
We’ve been thinking a lot about how often people need to prove things like degrees, certifications, or employment history and how weirdly manual that still is. Sending scans, PDFs, asking universities or HR to confirm stuff... it’s slow, messy, and prone to being faked.<p>What if there was a way to just receive official documents (like diplomas or work confirmations) in a format that’s verifiable forever not because someone signed a PDF, but because the issuing organization itself registered it in a tamper-proof system?<p>Something closer to a credentialing layer for the internet. You don’t need to “sign” anything, the document proves itself. And the user stays in control and decides who gets to see what.<p>It got us wondering:<p>Where do you personally encounter the most friction when proving credentials or background?<p>Would you feel more or less comfortable using something like this, where the source institution backs the authenticity directly?<p>What would be your biggest concern with something like this becoming common?<p>We’re trying to understand what a world with issuer-verified documents might look like and whether people actually want that. Curious to hear what others think.