在大型科技公司工作的朋友们：你们是如何使用Cursor的？
我是一家大型科技公司的员工。我们是一家典型的硅谷公司，但可能不是你想到的那一家。最近，我们获得了Cursor的批量许可证，我和我的团队正在探索其可能性。
我们都已经很清楚自动补全的潜力，并且通常在各自的工作流程中单独使用它。但我对我们能在这个基本用法之外实现什么感兴趣。
我们已经组建了一个工作小组，创建了公司MCP服务器，用于管理JIRA、Wiki等企业资源。我们正在积极探索其中的潜力。
我想问问这个社区里聪明的各位：
你们有没有发现Cursor工具在典型的编码助手行为之外的任何引人注目的用例？
我在让基础的Cursor与Sonnet一起完成整个多文件功能更改时遇到了一些困难，即使这些更改相对简单（即“氛围编码”）。在这些情况下，它的表现并没有我预期的那么一致。尽管基于以前提交的示例构建Cursor规则等上下文提供技术似乎显著改善了情况。
我很想和大家分享一些想法，因为我们在各自的企业技术圈中可能有些孤立，我感觉你们中的许多人正在做一些我也很想尝试的惊人事情。
查看原文
I am an employee of a large tech firm. One of those Silicon Valley staples, but probably not the one you are thinking of.
Recently we have gotten mass licenses for Cursor and my team and I have been exploring the possibilities.<p>We are all already well aware of the autocomplete potential and are generally utilizing it individually for such workflows. But I am interested in what we can accomplish beyond this basic usage.<p>We have already assembled a working group which has created company MCP servers for corporate resources in JIRA, Wiki, etc. And we are actively exploring the potential there.<p>My question for all of you bright people in this community:
Have you found any compelling use cases for Cursor tooling beyond the typical coding co-pilot behavior?<p>I have struggled a bit to get base Cursor w/ Sonnet to complete entire multi-file feature changes alone, even when they are relatively simple(vibe coding).<p>It is just not as consistent as I would have expected in those scenarios. Although context providing techniques like building cursor rules, based on example former commits, seem to improve things significantly.<p>I would love to share some ideas with you folks since we can be a bit isolated in our individual corporate tech bubbles, and I get the feeling many of you are doing some amazing things I would love to try out as well.