自我演化的认知模型用于意识系统设计
在过去的一年里，我一直在研究一个模型，旨在通过整合生理、情感、价值体系和抽象思维的层面，模拟人类的推理能力。这并不是另一个人工智能代理框架——更像是一种语言和架构，它将现实解读为意义和价值的动态互动，持续演变。
其核心是一个系统，其中：
逻辑、伦理和情感反馈循环融合为适应性原则。
决策过程成为对内部模式的有意识重构，而不是自动化。
每个原则（如非暴力或责任）都是从第一性原理构建而来的——从混沌 → 到和谐 → 到持续演变。
我已经记录了这个过程，通过与ChatGPT和其他人进行对话进行了测试，并将其与现实世界的哲学和技术问题联系起来。它仍在不断演变，但已经足够稳定，可以开始建立一个社区，并可能围绕它开发应用。
我在这里分享这些内容，是想看看是否有其他人也在探索类似的方向——并为合作、批评或哲学辩论打开大门。
我很想听听你的想法。为什么？因为如果这即使只有10%是正确的——它可能会帮助我们重新思考不仅是AGI架构，还包括我们如何大规模组织人类系统。
查看原文
Over the last year, I’ve been working on a model that helps simulate human-like reasoning by integrating layers of physiology, emotion, value systems, and abstract thinking. It's not another AI agent framework — it’s more like a language and architecture that interprets reality as dynamic interactions of meanings and values, constantly evolving.<p>The core of it is a system where:<p>Logic, ethics, and emotional feedback loops align into adaptive principles.<p>Decision-making becomes a conscious restructuring of internal patterns, not automation.<p>Each principle (like non-violence or responsibility) is built from first principles — from chaos → to harmony → to sustained evolution.<p>I’ve documented the process, tested it through conversations (with ChatGPT and people), and connected it with real-world philosophical and technological questions. It’s still evolving, but stable enough to start building a community and maybe applications around it.<p>I’m sharing it here to see if others are exploring similar directions — and to open the door for collaboration, critique, or philosophical sparring.<p>I’d love your thoughts. Why? Because if this is even 10% right — it could help rethink not just AGI architecture, but how we organize human systems at scale.