请问HN：维基百科被接受为可靠来源是否预示着人工智能也会被同样接受？
当维基百科刚开始时，它被认为是一个不可接受的参考来源，与《大英百科全书》等标准相比。如今，它的信息在这里被定期引用，通常没有争议。人工智能/大型语言模型的输出被认为容易产生幻觉，因此不适合用作参考。这种看法会不会像维基百科早期的争论一样，随着时间的推移而改变呢？
查看原文
When Wikipedia started it was denounced as an unacceptable reference source compared to standards like Encyclopedia Britannica. Now its information is regularly cited here, generally without dispute. The output/product of AI/LLM is denounced here as hallucination-prone and unacceptable for reference. Will that too pass just as Wikipedia's early days engendered fierce debate as to its suitability?