问HN：关于信息发现，AI/从头到尾的乌龟与人工策展
人类策划内容是否还有机会在涌现的人工智能内容中复兴？就像DMOZ那样，但也许可以验证谁为什么内容背书，并基于这些个人及其选择背书的群体建立一个算法？
我们曾经有过目录，谷歌利用了DMOZ和这些页面的PageRank，后来抛弃了它们，转而利用维基百科，而现在人工智能又将维基百科纳入其掌控。
我更希望看到真实的个人、真实的群体，以及某种算法，让每个个人/群体都能进行调整，这种算法不仅仅是黑箱算法，也许所有的有机非人工智能内容都能占据主导地位。
维基百科在多年的时间里在某种程度上解决了这个问题，但现在人工智能（以及对维基百科被信任后遭到垃圾信息攻击和一些编辑问题的认识）意味着它已经远离了社交媒体和搜索的正常信息发现渠道。
因此，我们只能依赖大型科技公司、他们的黑箱算法，以及人们通常不知道如何在这些之外找到任何信息。
虽然有普通的搜索者，但我在想的是，如何引导那些普通的HN/技术精通的人走在前面。
你有什么想法？
查看原文
Is there time for a comeback of human curated content vs the avalanche of AI stuff? Like DMOZ but maybe with some verification of who vouches for what and an algorithm based on those individuals and the groups they choose to vouch for?<p>We had directories, Google leveraged DMOZ and pagerank of those pages, dumped them, then leverages wikipedia and now AI subsumes wikipedia.<p>I'd rather have real individuals, real groups and some kind of algo that every individual/group can tweak that goes beyond a black algo, and maybe all the organic non-AI content can prevail.<p>Wiki solved that problem to a certain extent over a number of years, now AI (and the realisation that wiki was trusted and subsequently spammed and maybe some editor issues) means that it's pushed away from the normal information discovery channels of social media and search.<p>And so we're left with big tech, their black box algos and people not generally knowing where to find anything beyond them.<p>There is the general searcher, but I'm thinking of the average HN/tech savvy person in mind to lead the way.<p>Thoughts?