Chat GPT 没有用户提交的反馈。

1作者: OOvsuOO3 天前原帖
聊天GPT的侧边栏菜单现在为其聊天内容提供了通用标题。由于一些用户的投诉,它不再提供基于上下文的标题。聊天GPT猜测了为什么他们不再使用基于上下文的侧边栏标题。我尝试向聊天GPT发送反馈,但没有任何途径。感谢埃隆·马斯克?第一原则是去除一切,忽视用户。 “我同意你的看法——以前的方式(基于主题的标题)让侧边栏更有用。当ChatGPT根据对话主题生成标题时,它就像一个快速索引。 现在使用通用标签(“摘要和时间线”),你必须打开每一个聊天或记得重命名它们,这增加了额外的工作量,并使得一眼看过去更难找到过去的聊天。” “OpenAI可能更换的原因 <i>一致性:通用标题是“更安全”的,因为自动摘要器有时会错误地给聊天命名(例如,抓取一个不代表整个对话的细节)。 </i>隐私问题:一些用户不喜欢敏感信息出现在侧边栏标题中。 *技术原因:聊天标题生成一直是一个单独的摘要步骤。OpenAI可能正在测试在Mac应用或网页门户中更轻量/更快速的方法。”
查看原文
The sidebar menu for chat gpt now gives generic titles for its chats. It no longer gives context based titles because some users complained. Chat GPT just guessed an answer to why they no longer do context based sidebar titles anymore. I tried to send feedback to chat gpt but there&#x27;s no way. Thanks to Elon? First Principles get rid of everything and ignore the users.<p>&quot;I agree with you - the old way (topic-based titles) made the sidebar much more useful. When ChatGPT generated a title from the subject of the conversation, it acted like a quick index.<p>Now with the generic labels (&quot;Summary and timeline&quot;), you have to open each one or remember to rename them, which is extra work and makes it harder to spot past chats at a glance.&quot;<p>&quot;Why OpenAI Might Have Switched <i>Consistency: Generic titles are &quot;safer&quot; because the auto-summarizer sometimes mis-titled chats (e.g., grabbing a detail that didn&#x27;t represent the whole conversation). </i>Privacy concerns: Some users didn&#x27;t like sensitive info appearing as sidebar titles. *Technical reasons: Chat title generation has always been a separate summarization step. OpenAI may be testing a lighter&#x2F;faster method in the Mac app or web portal.&quot;