请问HN：公司是否使用SAFe来为外包做准备？
我的雇主几个月前实施了SAFe（敏捷框架）。这在公司内部引起了极大的不满。现在，他们刚刚宣布将裁员所有开发人员（几百人）。所有的开发工作将外包给一家位于印度的公司。
内部有传言称，实施SAFe是为了为外包做准备。理由是，SAFe对于拥有自己可信开发人员的公司来说是无效的，但对于控制远程外部合作方的交付则是完美的。
我们这里只有一个案例可以参考，所以我想知道这是否是一种趋势？是否还有其他人经历过他们的雇主在外包开发工作之前实施SAFe？
查看原文
My employer implemented SAFe several months ago. It was wildly unpopular. Now they have just announced that all developers (a few hundred people) will be laid off. All development work will be outsourced to a company in India.<p>There are internal whispers that SAFe was implemented in order to prepare for the off-shoring. The reasoning is that SAFe is ineffective for a company with their own trusted developers, but perfect for controlling the delivery of an external, faraway actor.<p>We only have one anecdatum to go on here, so I'm wondering if this is a trend or not? Has anyone else experienced that their employer implemented SAFe before off-shoring development work?