请问HN：通用人工智能的标准有多高？哪些问题是“AGI完全”的？
我想“AGI”和“ASI”背后的命名仍然存在争议。我刚刚观看了Sundar Pichai在Lex Fridman节目中的采访，他巧妙地几乎嘲讽了这个术语，基本上将其描述为一种最近的发明，是一种新词，主要用于表示“我们的人工智能很快将变得非常先进”。
尽管如此，我的问题是：截至2025年9月，哪些问题是即使是最优秀的人工智能也无法解决的？我能想到很多，尽管由于它们目前尚未解决，因此无论对任何人或人类工具来说，它们都可能是不可解决的。
以下是一些随机排列的问题，纯粹是“随口而出”：
1. P ≠ NP；
2. 广义相对论与量子力学的统一；
3. 证明/反驳黎曼假设；
4. “孤独跑者猜想”的证明/反驳；
5. 治愈大多数情况下有效的四期癌症的方法；
6. 更低温度的聚变；
7. 无反应驱动的证明/反驳；
8. 证明/反驳“量子优越性”；
9. 在量子计算机上安装用户友好的主要操作系统；
10. 人形机器人在比赛中击败UFC战斗员；
11. 人形机器人在跑酷方面表现优于Storror；
12. 人工智能设计出比变压器快几个数量级的文本生成/媒体生成算法，且不牺牲质量（或偏差仅5-10%）；
13. 人工智能建造自我复制的机器人，在火星上建立城市（这个想法我大约一个月前从Grok那里偷来的...）；
14. 发现制作便宜体外肉的方法；
15. 合成未命名元素；
16. 对量子力学的正确解释；
17. 解决“时间问题”；
18. 制造胶球；
19. 证明/拒绝Collatz猜想；
还有很多……在你看来，哪些是类似AGI的问题？
我知道我上面列出的问题表述并不完美，例如“便宜”的体外肉是一个开放的解释，而100万度的聚变仍然是大约“两个数量级”更冷，但对于主流聚变的影响可能是无用的。不过，毕竟这是一个互联网论坛，而不是博士论文，尽管这些问题的表述很糟糕，但如果能够解决，将会在人工智能或其他领域引发巨大的范式转变，某些人将会做得非常正确，甚至超越Demis Hassabis，或者爱因斯坦、达芬奇、特斯拉、阿达等人。
我很好奇许多人希望从人工智能中看到什么，鉴于这个论坛的智商很高，我想不会出现像“照片级真实的第一人称射击游戏”或“听起来像Shelby的特斯拉”或“更美味的汉堡”、“酷炫的喷气背包”、“完全沉浸式虚拟现实，可以采访Andrew Tate”、“敞篷波音”等等这种低水平的回答。
查看原文
I guess the nomenclature behind "AGI" and "ASI" is still debatable and i just watched an interview with Sundar Pichai (on Lex Fridman) where he brilliantly almost mocked the term, essentially describing it as a recent invention, neologism mostly used to mean "our ai will soon be very advanced".<p>Even so my question is: what problems as of 2025 September are impossible for even the best AI?
I can think of many, though since they are currently unsolved, they may as well be impossible regardless for any human or human tool anyway:<p>*here are some problems ordered randomly, "on top of my head":<p>1. P =|!= NP;
2.Unification of gen. relativity+quantum mechanics;
3. prove/disprove the Riemann hypothesis;
4. "lonely runner conjecture" proof/disproof;
5. cure for 4th stage cancer that works most of the time;
6. orders of magnitudes colder fusion;
7. reactionless drive - proof/disproof;
8. prove(show)/disprove 'quantum supremacy';
9. install user-friendly main purpose OS on quantum computer;
10. humanoid defeats ufc fighter in a fight;
11. humanoid performs parkour better than Storror;
12. AI designs orders of magnitude faster textgen/mediagen algorithms than transformers without sacrificing quality (or 5-10% worse deviation);
13. AI builds self-replicating robots that build city on Mars (i stole this idea from Grok month ago or so...);
14. discovers way to make cheap invitro meat;
15. synthesizes ununennium;
16. correct interpretation of quantum mechanics;
17. solve the 'problem of time';
18. make glueballs;
19. prove/reject the Collatz conjecture;<p>and many more...what in your opinion are agi-like problems?<p>I know my phrasing of the problems above isn't perfect, for example "cheap" as in invitro meat is open to interpretation and 1 million degrees fusion is still ~2 'orders of magnitude' colder but likely useless to have impact on mainstream fusion etc. But it's an internet forum after all not Ph.d thesis, regardless any of the problems if solved despite the horrible wording will signal an immense paradigma shift in AI or whatever it "signals" someone/some people will be doing something very right surpassing even Demis Hassabis, or even Einstein, Da Vinci, Tesla, Ada and the likes.<p>I'm curious what many people want to see from AI, since the IQ of this forum is high, I guess it won't be a beavis-and-butthead level of answers like "photorealistic fps" or "teslas that sound like shelby" or "tastier burgers", "badass jetpacks" , "fully immersive VR where you can interview andrew tate", "cabrio boeing", etc etc.