请问HN：我在代理编码方面做错了什么？
以下是我给Claude Code CLI和VSCode代理的提示内容，针对我的TS项目：
```
我修改了作业创建的类型签名和行为。之前，作业定义的创建需要一个批量参数（从队列中创建）。现在它直接接受队列，采用异步方式，并且在创建时需要传入databaseClient（而不是在批量执行时）。它不再返回任何内容——这没关系，因为结果仅用于日志记录——而这现在由我们处理，所以我们不必担心。我们能否重构代码库以利用新的JobDefinition.create？请删除多余的“作业已创建”日志。
只执行这个任务，仅此而已。如果你看到与此无关的内容，认为需要重构的地方——请不要修改它。仅执行与此任务直接相关的操作。
```
所以有两个指令：
1. 完成任务
2. 不要做与任务无关的事情（在后续尝试中因沮丧而添加）
我的经历：
代理的流程开始得很好——它找到了所有需要更改的文件并开始进行编辑。
到第5个文件时，我注意到除了请求的重构外，它还开始重新排序`JobDefinition.create`方法的对象键。虽然在语义上没有实际影响，但这让我非常沮丧，因为这使得差异的审查变得更加困难。
稍后，它开始修改之前不满意的日志消息，最终完全偏离轨道，向我的函数定义中添加了它认为需要的参数（引入了类型/运行时错误）。
VSCode会定期暂停并要求确认以继续。每次我都借此机会重新提示代理保持专注：
我：“停止偏离任务——停止重命名变量，重新排序参数。只需按照任务的指示做，不做其他。”
代理：“你说得对。我为偏离任务而道歉。让我专注于任务：重构JobDefinition.create调用以使用新的签名，并删除多余的‘作业已创建’日志。”
但每次坏行为在一段时间后都会重新出现。
我不确定自己哪里做错了。我原以为这种机械化的重复工作对代理工作流程来说是轻而易举的，但它却不断失去连贯性。
最后，我不得不撤回所有更改，因为我对生成代码的质量完全没有信任。
抱歉占用了这么多文字，但我对浪费的时间感到非常沮丧，急切想知道我哪里做错了！
提前感谢！
查看原文
Here is the prompt I gave both Claude Code CLI, and the VSCode agent for my TS project:<p>```<p>I have modified the type signature and behaviour of how jobs are created. Previously, job definition create took a batch argument (created from a queue). Now it takes the queue directly, is async, requires the databaseClient to be passed in at creation (vs. when the batch is executed). It no longer returns anything - which is fine because the result was only being used for logging - which is now done for us so we don't have to worry. Can we refactor the codebase to make use of the new JobDefinition.create? Remove the vestigial "Job created" log please.<p>Perform this task and this task only. If you see something unrelated that you believe needs to be refactored - DO NOT MODIFY IT. ONLY PERFORM ACTIONS DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO THIS TASK<p>```<p>So there are two instructions:<p>1. Do the task<p>2. Don't do stuff that isn't the task (added in frustration on subsequent attempts)<p>My experience:<p>The agent flow started well - it found all the files that needed to change and began making edits.<p>By about file #5 I noticed that on top of requested refactor it started re-ordering object keys of the `JobDefinition.create` method. Although semantically a no-op, this was incredibly frustrating as it made diffs much harder to review.<p>A little later, it started to modify log messages it wasn't happy with before eventually completely going off the rails and adding arguments to my function definitions that it _thought_ they needed (introducing type/run-time errors).<p>VSCode would periodically pause and ask for a confirmation in order to continue. Each time I used the opportunity to re-prompt the agent to stay on target:<p>Me: "STOP GOING OFF TASK - STOP RENAMING VARIABLES, REORDERING PARAMS. JUST DO AS THE TASK TELLS YOU AND NOTHING ELSE"<p>Agent: "You're absolutely right. I apologize for going off task. Let me focus solely on the task: refactoring JobDefinition.create calls to use the new signature and removing vestigial "Job created" logs"<p>And each time the bad behavior would return after some time.<p>I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I assumed this sort of mechanical monkey work would be bread and butter for an agentic workflow - but it just keeps losing coherence.<p>I ended up reverting all the changes as I had absolutely 0 trust in the quality of the generated code.<p>I apologise for the wall of text but I'm quite frustrated about all the time wasted and am desperate to know what I'm doing wrong!<p>Thanks in advance!