HackerNews中文版

我注意到在Reddit上有一种反复出现的行为。当一篇帖子是由人工智能生成时，用户往往会感到有必要将其驳回，即使帖子内容实际上是有趣且有效的。这种逻辑似乎是：既然是用人工智能制作的，那它就自动是垃圾。顺便提一下，这对代码也同样适用。我不得不承认，我自己也曾在心里进行过这种歧视。问题在于：这是一种偏见。仅仅因为使用了人工智能制作某样东西，并不意味着这个东西就自动无效。我理解这种偏见的来源，很多人工智能生成的内容确实非常懒惰和无聊。但这并不是一个有效的理由去忽视某样东西，仅仅因为我们的人工智能雷达被触发了。很多人，包括我自己，都会使用人工智能来纠正语法和改善句法。那我们为什么不这样做呢？我认为避免这种偏见很重要，因为在这个时代，关注风格而非内容正是我们不应该做的事情。我们应该更加关注所写内容的实际意义，因为人工智能在制造错误论点和伪造事实方面可能非常具有说服力。破折号并不是关闭你批判性思维的有效理由。

查看原文

I noticed a recurrent behaviour on Reddit. When a post is AI generated, users feel the need to dismiss it, even though the content of the post is actually interesting and valid.The logic seems to be: AI was used to make this, so it's automatically garbage. This is also true for code by the way.Not gonna lie, I also found myself doing this sort of discrimination in my head.The problem is the following: this is a bias. Just because AI was used to make something, that something is not automatically invalid.I understand where the bias comes from, a lot of this AI generated content is extremely lazy and boring. But that's not a valid arguments to disregard something just because our AI radar is triggered. A lot of people, me included, uses AI to correct grammar and improve syntax. And why wouldn't we?I think avoiding this bias is important because focusing on style instead of content is exactly what we shouldn't be doing in this time and age. We should pay even more attention to the actual meaning of what is written since AI can be very persuasive at making faulty arguments and forging facts.Em dashes are not a valid reason to shut off your critical thinking.

仅仅因为某个内容是由人工智能生成的就予以否定，并不是批判性思维。