问HN：云服务提供商在竞争中不敌裸金属服务器了吗？
最近，我注意到在X平台上出现了一个新趋势：开发者（尤其是独立开发者）开始抛弃云服务提供商，直接转向像Hetzner这样的裸金属服务器。
老实说，我认为大型云公司并没有跟上时代。与独立的替代方案相比，他们的服务显得笨重。只需比较一下Vercel和Amplify的开发体验，你就会明白我的意思。此外，AWS在初创企业的信用额度方面变得更加吝啬。
把这两点结合起来，难怪越来越少的人选择在AWS上托管他们的MVP（最小可行产品）。在拥有数据库和服务器的情况下，要保持每月150美元以下是很困难的，而在裸金属服务器上，你可以以大约20美元每月的价格获得16GB的内存。
- 你认为云服务真的在失去市场份额吗？
- 对于那些使用裸金属服务器的人：你是如何处理数据库备份、持续集成/持续交付（CI/CD）和日志提取的？
- 你会使用裸金属服务器进行扩展吗？
[卡洛斯](https://github.com/clostao)
查看原文
Lately, I’ve noticed a new trend on X: Devs (and indie hackers in particular) are ditching cloud providers and jumping straight to bare-metal servers like Hetzner.<p>Honestly, I think the big cloud companies just haven’t kept up. Their services feel clunky compared to the standalone alternatives. Just try comparing Vercel’s dev experience to Amplify’s, and you’ll see what I mean. On top of that, AWS has gotten way stingier with startup credits.<p>Put those two together, and it’s no surprise fewer people are hosting their MVPs on AWS. It’s tough to stay under $150/month with a database and a server, while on bare metal you can grab 16 GB RAM for around $20/month.<p>- Do you think the cloud is actually losing ground?
- And for those using bare-metal: how do you handle DB backups, CI/CD, and pulling logs?
- Would you scale something using bare-metal servers?<p>[Carlos](https://github.com/clostao)