HackerNews中文版

随着各种大型语言模型（LLM）越来越受欢迎，类似于“我问了Gemini，Gemini说……”的评论也随之增多。虽然这些指导方针是在不同的时期制定（并不断修订）的，但似乎是时候讨论一下这些评论是否应该在HN上受到欢迎。一些例子： - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46164360 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200460 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080064 就我个人而言，我在HN上是为了进行人类之间的对话，而大型LLM生成的文本只会妨碍我阅读来自真实人类（至少是这样假设的）的真实文本。你怎么看？是否应该允许那些基本上归结为“我问了$LLM关于$X，$LLM说的是……”的回应出现在HN上，并更新指导方针以说明人们不应该对此进行批评（类似于当前的其他指导方针），还是应该新增一条指导方针，要求人们避免将大型LLM的回复复制粘贴到评论中，或者采取其他完全不同的措施？

查看原文

As various LLMs become more and more popular, so does comments with "I asked Gemini, and Gemini said ....".While the guidelines were written (and iterated on) during a different time, it seems like it might be time to have a discussion about if those sort of comments should be welcomed on HN or not.Some examples:- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46164360- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200460- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080064Personally, I'm on HN for the human conversation, and large LLM-generated texts just get in the way of reading real text from real humans (assumed, at least).What do you think? Should responses that basically boil down to "I asked $LLM about $X, and here is what $LLM said:" be allowed on HN, and the guidelines updated to state that people shouldn't critique it (similar to other guidelines currently), or should a new guideline be added to ask people from refrain from copy-pasting large LLM responses into the comments, or something else completely?

请问HN：在HN的指导原则中，是否应该禁止“我问了$AI，它说”这样的回复？