问HN:你们是如何验证定时任务是否按预期执行的?

3作者: BlackPearl0212 天前原帖
我遇到了一个问题,我的定时任务“成功”了,但实际上并没有正确执行它们的工作。 例如: - 备份定时任务运行,退出代码为0,但生成了空文件。 - 数据同步成功完成,但只处理了部分记录。 - 报告生成器完成,但输出的数据不完整。 日志显示一切正常,但结果却是错误的。实际上,错误可能在日志的某个地方,但谁会主动检查日志呢?我可不想每天都翻阅日志文件,看看是否有什么悄悄失败了。 我尝试过: - 在脚本中添加验证——有效,但仍然需要检查日志。 - 使用Webhook警报——但你必须为每个脚本编写连接器。 - 错误监控工具——但它们只捕捉异常,而不是错误结果。 最终,我构建了一个简单的监控工具,它监视作业结果,而不仅仅是执行状态——你将实际结果(文件大小、记录数等)发送给它,如果有异常,它会发出警报。这样就无需翻阅日志了。 但我很好奇:你们都是怎么处理这个问题的?你们真的定期检查日志吗,还是有其他方法可以主动提醒你们结果与预期不符?
查看原文
I&#x27;ve been running into this issue where my cron jobs &quot;succeed&quot; but don&#x27;t actually do their job correctly.<p>For example:<p>Backup cron runs, exit code 0, but creates empty files<p>Data sync completes successfully but only processes a fraction of records<p>Report generator finishes but outputs incomplete data<p>The logs say everything&#x27;s fine, but the results are wrong. Actually, the errors are probably in the logs somewhere, but who checks logs proactively? I&#x27;m not going through log files every day to see if something silently failed.<p>I&#x27;ve tried:<p>Adding validation in scripts - works, but you still need to check the logs<p>Webhook alerts - but you have to write connectors for every script<p>Error monitoring tools - but they only catch exceptions, not wrong results<p>I ended up building a simple monitoring tool that watches job results instead of just execution - you send it the actual results (file size, count, etc.) and it alerts if something&#x27;s off. No need to dig through logs.<p>But I&#x27;m curious: how do you all handle this? Are you actually checking logs regularly, or do you have something that proactively alerts you when results don&#x27;t match expectations?