告诉HN：我们尚未发现氛围编码的规则。
我突然想到，有些事情绝对不应该进行“氛围编码”。我认为这是一个重要的认识，因为这意味着在氛围编码的应用上存在着根本的社会限制。
我们绝对不应该进行氛围编码的第一件事：密码学。构建良好的密码系统不仅需要对数学有深入的理解，还需要对密码学和安全的历史有深刻的知识，而你**不能出错**。你不能让一个漏洞溜进去，也不能凭空想象什么。它必须经过世界级专家多年的审查才能被认为是安全的。而且，它仍然可能会因为某种没人预料到的技术而失败。氛围编码不仅无法保证这些，甚至由于其缺陷，失败几乎是必然的。
还有一些事情是绝对不能允许失败的，比如飞行控制系统、车辆电子控制单元、武器系统、核能、城市供水、供电等工业控制。即使氛围编码能够近似这些东西，也没有人会（或应该）信任它。
因此，尽管我们在寻找有趣的人工智能编码应用时，也应该考虑到它的使用将面临非常现实的障碍。“旧世界”的编码方式将不得不继续存在。我们最终将形成两个截然不同的软件宇宙，拥有不同的公司、不同的员工和不同的规则。我们甚至可能需要更新API/ABI，以标记输入/输出是否来自大型语言模型，以防止一个组件的幻觉“感染”另一个需要保持安全和可靠的系统。
查看原文
It just occurred to me that there are some things that should never, ever, be vibe coded. I think this is an important realization, because it means there are fundamental, societal limits to what we can do with vibe coding.<p>The first thing we should never, ever vibe code: cryptography. Building good crypto requires not only advanced understanding of mathematics, but also a deep knowledge of the history of cryptography and security, and you <i>can not be wrong</i>. You can't let a bug slip in, or hallucinate something. It has to stand up to years of scrutiny by world-class experts before it can be considered secure. And it may still fall to a technique nobody predicted. Not only can vibe-coding not guarantee any of that, it's so flawed that failure is virtually certain.<p>And there's other things that simply can't be allowed to fail. Flight control systems. Vehicle ECUs. Weapons systems. Nuclear power. Industrial controls for municipal water, power utilities, etc. Even if vibe-coding could approximate these things, nobody ever would (or should) trust it.<p>So while we're out here finding really fun uses of AI coding, we should also consider that there will be very real barriers to its use. The "old world" of coding will have to stick around. We're going to end up with two very different universes of software, with different companies, different staff, different rules. We may even have to update APIs/ABIs to mark when an input/output comes from an LLM, to prevent one component's hallucinations from "infecting" another system that needs to remain safe and reliable.