HackerNews中文版

我很好奇人们在实际生产中是如何处理这些问题的，而不是在演示中。如果你正在运行自主或半自主的代理，这些代理会：调用付费API购买数据调用计量工具在没有人工批准的情况下链式执行操作……你是如何处理支付和限制的？我在实际应用中看到的主要是一些变通方法：提供商级的API密钥，带有严格的使用上限代理服务，稍后再进行重新计费特定框架的黑客手段，存在于分支中仅限警报或手动批准模式或者干脆不让代理直接支出这些都感觉不是一个干净的抽象，尤其是当代理做出成千上万的微决策时。困难的部分似乎不是“转移资金”，而是安全地委托支出权限：多少用于什么在什么条件下以及如何撤销或审计这些权限框架自然会避免这个问题，但这使得每个团队都在重新发明同样脆弱的模式。所以我真心想问：你们今天是如何处理这个问题的？有什么地方出现了问题或者让你感到不舒服？这个问题还是太早，还是已经给你带来了痛苦？希望听到具体的解决方案——即使答案是“我们放弃了这个问题”。

查看原文

I’m curious how people are actually doing this in production, not in demos.If you’re running autonomous or semi-autonomous agents that:call paid APIspurchase datainvoke metered toolschain actions without human approval…how are you handling payments and limits?What I mostly see in the wild are workarounds:provider-level API keys with hard usage capsproxy services that re-bill laterframework-specific hacks living in side branchesalert-only or manual approval modesor simply not letting agents spend directlyNone of these feel like a clean abstraction, especially once agents make thousands of micro-decisions.The hard part doesn’t seem to be “moving money,” but delegating spending authority safely:how muchon whatunder what conditionsand how to revoke or audit itFrameworks understandably avoid this, but that leaves every team reinventing the same fragile patterns.So I’m genuinely asking:How are you handling this today?What breaks or feels uncomfortable?Is this problem still premature, or already painful for you?Would love to hear concrete setups — even if the answer is “we punted on it.”

人们是如何处理自主代理的付费外部API的？