YC S26 申请： “附上你特别自豪的编码代理会话”
在过去六个月里，我使用Vibecoded开发了几款iOS应用和一个完整的SaaS（SEOZilla.ai），老实说，我三到四个月前的最佳编码代理会话会是很好的提交。出色的调试，识别糟糕的架构选择，反复的解决问题。
但最近呢？我主要在撰写产品规格，做一些简单的架构决策，以及进行质量保证。代理们就……处理这些事情。无论是Opus、Sonnet、Cursor，还是你正在使用的其他工具，过去两个月的进步真是惊人。
这引出了一个真实的问题：YC到底在这个提示中选择什么？最令人印象深刻的会话可能来自使用更差工具或解决更难问题的人。那些找到了最佳工作流程的创始人，可能会有最无聊的记录。
还有其他人发现他们的“最佳”代理会话现在反而是最无趣的吗？
查看原文
I vibecoded a couple of iOS apps & a full SaaS (SEOZilla.ai) over the past six months and the honest answer is: my best coding agent sessions from 3-4 months ago would make great submissions. Excellent debugging, catching poor architecture choices, back-and-forth problem solving.<p>But lately? I mostly write product specs, make simple architecture decisions, and do QA. The agents just... handle it. Across the board, Opus, Sonnet, Cursor, whatever you're using, the jump in the last 2 months has been wild.<p>Which raises a genuine question: what is YC actually selecting for with this prompt? The most impressive sessions are probably from people using worse tools or tackling harder problems. The founders who've figured out the best workflows might have the most boring transcripts.<p>Anyone else finding that their "best" agent sessions are now the least interesting ones?