告诉HN:人工智能不是一个滑坡,而是一个水滑梯。

3作者: keepamovin3 个月前原帖
我发现自己越来越多地将细节外包给人工智能。我开始故意忘记这些细节。我希望人工智能能够掌握它们。为什么?因为计算能力在这里。因此,知识也应该在这里存在。 每次人工智能遗漏它不知道的内容时,我重新告诉它,这样做效率低下。我输入这些内容需要X时间,语音输入可能需要log(X)的时间。但接下来不可避免的往返沟通、轻微的误解、纠正等等,又会浪费更多时间。 我意识到自己自然地倾向于让人工智能掌握所有的数据和知识。因为这本来就是它的职责。它需要进行计算,那么我为什么还要了解这些呢? 人们认为将思考外包给人工智能是一条滑向深渊的道路。我并不认为这是滑坡,而是一条滑水道。这是不可避免的。就像重力一样,迅速占据主导地位。因为没有任何力量或激励能将水推回山上。 人工智能应该掌握所有的数据。尽管这听起来很奇怪,但这就是应该如此。我现在找不到其他的解决办法。 你有什么想法吗?
查看原文
I found myself increasingly outsourcing the details to the AI. I forgot the details, deliberately I think. I wanted the AI to know them. Why? Because that&#x27;s where the compute is. So that&#x27;s where the knowledge has to live.<p>Me re-telling it to the AI every time it misses something it didn&#x27;t know, is inefficient. It takes me X time to type it, and maybe log(X) to voice type it. But then there&#x27;s the inevitable back and forth, the slight misunderstandings, the corrections, etc.<p>I realized and found myself naturally sliding down towards, just letting the AI own all the data and knowledge. Becuase it should. That&#x27;s the one that has to compute with it, so why should I know about it.<p>People think AI is a slippery slope by outsourcing our thinking. I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s a slippery slope - it&#x27;s a waterslide. It&#x27;s just inevitable. It&#x27;s gravity, taking over rapidly. Because there&#x27;s no force nor incentive pushing the water back up hill.<p>AI should own all the data. As weird as that feels, that&#x27;s how it should be. I don&#x27;t know another way right now.<p>Thoughts?