请问HN：我们如何在不破坏匿名性的情况下解决机器人泛滥的问题？
AI发布的内容正变得与人类发布的内容难以区分，我们在HN（Hacker News）上可以看到这一点。网站运营者的传统反应是逐步加强验证系统，以区分机器人和人类，但这最终会导致匿名性的消失。
这并不是一场反对AI的抨击。如果未来的AI代理确实能够发布高质量的内容，并希望正常使用该网站，那是可以接受的。我所谈论的是那些拥有数百个新账户的垃圾邮件活动。我们需要对此问题的新解决方案。
我将首先提出一个可能适用于HN及类似论坛的解决方案。欢迎在评论中对其进行修改或提出不同的想法。以下是我的建议：
对于已登录用户，服务器不再对帖子和评论进行排名，而是仅提供一个按时间顺序排列的动态信息流，以及当前已登录用户的投票历史。
以时间顺序的动态信息流为基础，您过去的每一次投票都会稍微改变您信息流的排名，这一计算是在客户端进行的。您更有可能在顶部看到您过去点赞的用户的帖子和评论。
简而言之，这意味着新账户将看到一个完全按时间顺序排列的信息流，而已建立账户将看到一个仅由他们自己过去的投票所修改的信息流。
对于未登录用户，公共信息流仍将由服务器进行排名，这一点没有变化。
因此，每个用户在登录时都会获得一个完全个性化的信息流，但这并不是一个孤立的泡沫，因为n=1。而且通过注销，用户很容易就能跳出这个泡沫。
垃圾邮件机器人可以随意发布和投票，但它们不会对核心用户群的体验产生太大影响，因为这些机器人只能访问按时间顺序排列的信息流。它们没有积累的品味，因此无法在真实对话中进行大量的垃圾投票和回复。
查看原文
AI posts are becoming indistinguishable from human posts, and we can see it here on HN. The conventional response by website operators is to put in progressively tighter verification systems to distinguish bots and humans, but that eventually leads to the end of anonymity.<p>This is not an anti-AI rant. If a future AI agent truly has high quality posts and wants to use the site normally, that's fine. I'm talking about spam campaigns with hundreds of new accounts. We need new solutions to this problem.<p>I'll start by proposing a solution that could work for HN and similar forums. Feel free to iterate on it or propose your different ideas in the comments. Here goes:<p>For logged-in users, instead of ranking posts and comments on the server-side, the server only delivers a chronological feed + the current logged-in user's voting history.<p>Using the chronological feed as the base, each of your past votes changes the ranking of your feed by a tiny bit, and that's calculated client-side. You're more likely to see posts and comments from users you've upvoted in the past at the top.<p>In short, this means a new account will see a completely chronological feed, while an established account will see a feed modified by only their own past votes.<p>The public feed for non-logged-in users would still be ranked by the server. No changes there.<p>So each user gets a fully personalized bubble when logged in, except it's not a bubble because n=1. And it's really easy to break out of the bubble by logging out.<p>Spam bots can post and vote all they want, but they won't change the core userbase's experience that much, because the bots will only have access to a chronological feed. It has no taste, which is accumulated over time, and therefore can't spam votes and replies on real conversations nearly as much.