启动 HN:Voltair(YC W26)——电力公用事业的无人机与充电网络
大家好!我们是Voltair的Hayden、Ronan、Avi和Warren(<a href="https://voltairlabs.com">https://voltairlabs.com</a>)。我们正在开发用于电力设施检查的气候适应型混合固定翼无人机。
这里有一些视频资料:<a href="https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci" rel="nofollow">https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=...</a>,以及我们最新原型的照片:<a href="https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4</a>。
美国有700万英里电力线路(足够往返月球14次),这些线路正在老化。超过50%的电力通过至少已有30年历史的变压器,这大约是它们开始出现故障的时间。
电力线路导体仅仅是裸露的金属,承载着4,000到765,000伏特的电压,通常悬挂在陶瓷绝缘体上,支撑它们的通常是木材。这是一种成本效益高且相对可靠的电力传输方式。但是,当木材开始腐烂,或者插销掉落,带电导体在风大的日子里掉落到一棵枯树上时,就会引发像去年洛杉矶的帕利塞德火灾那样毁灭性的野火。
大多数电力公司通过步行巡检来解决这个问题。电工们开车带着夹板或iPad,使用望远镜通过检查清单来目视确认一切正常。一个电工每天可以检查大约50到150根电杆,但一些最小的农村电力合作社(大约20名员工)通常有大约50,000根配电杆。显然,这样的数学计算是行不通的。因此,某根电力杆的检查频率大约是每10年一次(至少这是他们告诉保险理赔员的)。
直升机也被用来进行检查,但起飞费用高达25,000美元,更重要的是,每年都有电工在直升机坠毁中丧生。此外,卫星无法提供这些检查所需的毫米级精度。
无人机已经成为最佳解决方案。乔治亚电力公司在转向使用无人机后节省了60%的运营费用,而Xcel电力发现无人机能够发现比步行巡检多60%的缺陷(因为无人机可以从电杆顶部进行观察)。
问题二:无人机受到需要不断充电和FAA超视距(BVLOS)法规的限制。作为回应,资金最充足的电力公司(例如PG&E、SCE)主要派出驾驶员在卡车中收集数据。
目前无人机领域的领导者——Skydio和DJI——已经构建了无人机箱解决方案。这些充电站存在固有的并发限制(一次只能充电一架无人机),并且在大面积土地上扩展困难。Skydio的收费是每个箱子25万美元,且在理想性能下的往返范围约为15英里。它们既昂贵又不灵活。
我们的第一个解决方案(以及为什么没有成功):我们进入YC时想要构建能够从电力线路周围的磁场中感应充电的无人机。我们使用了一个分裂式电流变压器,将其夹在导体上并收集电力。我们花了大约4个月的时间测试和开发这个硬件,并成功在现场给一些电池充电。这是一个非常酷的概念验证。
但我们遇到了一个大问题。配电线路上的电流不足。这些是你家外面的木杆,而不是你在乡村可能看到的高大的钢铁输电塔。一般来说,我们需要大约1兆瓦的电力——或大约1000户家庭——通过线路流动,以便高效地为我们的无人机充电。
查看原文
Hey HN! We’re Hayden, Ronan, Avi, and Warren of Voltair (<a href="https://voltairlabs.com/">https://voltairlabs.com/</a>). We’re making weatherized, hybrid-fixed drones deployed for power utility inspections.<p>Here’s some footage: <a href="https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci" rel="nofollow">https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=...</a> and a photo of our latest prototype: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4</a>.<p>The U.S. has 7M miles of power lines (enough to go to the moon and back 14 times), and they're aging. Over 50% of all power flows through transformers that are at least 30 years old, which is about the point where they start to fail.<p>Power line conductors are just bare metal with 4,000-765,000 volts sitting on ceramic insulators, usually held up by pieces of wood. It’s a cost effective and relatively reliable way to move power. But when the wood starts to rot, or the cotter pin falls out, and a live conductor is dropped on a dead tree on a windy day, you get devastating wildfires like the Palisades Fire in LA last year.<p>Most power utilities solve this problem with foot patrols. Linemen drive out with a clipboard or an iPad, and run through a checklist with binoculars to visually confirm everything is in order. A lineman can inspect about 50-150 poles per day, yet some of the smallest rural electric cooperatives (with about ~20 employees) typically have about 50,000 distribution poles. Clearly the math doesn’t work out. As a result, a given utility pole is inspected about every 10 years (at least that’s what they tell their insurance adjuster).<p>Helicopters are also used, but cost $25k to get off the ground, and more importantly, every year linemen die in helicopter crashes. Also note that satellites can’t deliver the mm precision needed for these inspections.<p>Drones have emerged as the best solution. Georgia Power saved 60% on operating expenses when they switched to using drones, and Xcel power found drones to find 60% more defects than foot patrols (because of pole-top vantage point).<p>Problem #2: Drones are held back by the need to constantly recharge and FAA beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) regulations. In response, the most well funded utilities (e.g., PG&E, SCE) primarily send out pilots in trucks to collect the data.<p>Current leaders in the drone space – Skydio and DJI – have built drone-in-a-box solutions. These charging stations have inherent concurrency constraints (only one drone at a time) and don’t scale easily over large land areas. Skydio charges $250,000 / box, and has a there-and-back range of about 15 miles (assuming ideal performance). They are expensive and inflexible.<p>Our first solution (and why it didn’t work): We entered YC wanting to build drones that charge inductively from the magnetic fields around power lines. We used a split-core current transformer, wrapped it around the conductor with a clamp, and harvested power. We spent about 4 months testing and developing this hardware, and successfully recharged a few batteries in the field. It was a really cool proof of concept.<p>But we ran into a big problem. There’s not enough current on distribution lines. These are the wooden poles outside your home, as opposed to the tall steel transmission towers you might see in the countryside. Generally speaking, we needed about a MW of power – or about 1000 homes – to flow through the lines to charge our drone performantly.