我被裁员了,意识到科技招聘是多么不完善。

5作者: nirvanist16 天前原帖
在二月份,由于预算削减,我在一家小型初创公司被裁员。<p>我是一名拥有20年经验的高级开发人员,直到现在,我从未真正为找工作而苦恼。招聘人员曾经定期联系我,机会总是存在。<p>这次情况却不同。<p>经过超过100份申请后,我开始注意到一些不合常理的模式。相同的公司每天重复发布相同的职位。那些申请人数达到数百的职位似乎永远不会关闭。自动回复,但没有真正的后续联系。<p>在某个时刻,我感觉自己不再是在申请工作,而是在为一个系统提供数据。简历被算法解析,通过关键词过滤,最终被简化为一个分数。没有人际互动,只有信号和流程。<p>然后是面试。每轮之间间隔数周。相同的算法问题,与现实工作脱节。那些奖励练习而非经验的问题。<p>我开始质疑一切。不仅是这个过程,还有如今开发人员的评估方式。<p>感觉这个系统是为了筛选人而优化的,而不是为了找到最优秀的人。<p>我认为我无法改变这一切,但我必须适应它。<p>好奇这里的其他人最近是否也经历了类似的事情。<p>顺便说一下,这种情况现在在加拿大发生,所以我想在美国也差不多。
查看原文
In February, I got laid off from a small startup due to budget cuts.<p>I’m a senior developer with 20 years of experience, and until now I had never really struggled to find a job. Recruiters used to reach out regularly, and opportunities were always there.<p>This time was different.<p>After more than 100 applications, I started noticing patterns that didn’t make sense. The same companies reposting the same jobs every day. Listings with hundreds of applicants that never seemed to close. Automated responses, but no real follow-up.<p>At some point, it felt like I wasn’t applying for jobs anymore, but feeding a system. Resumes parsed by algorithms, filtered by keywords, reduced to a score. No human interaction, just signals and pipelines.<p>Then came the interviews. Weeks between each round. The same algorithmic problems, disconnected from real-world work. The kind of questions that reward practice, not experience.<p>I started questioning everything. Not just the process, but how developers are evaluated today.<p>It feels like the system is optimized to filter people out, not to find the best ones.<p>I don’t think I can fix it. But I had to adapt to it.<p>Curious if others here have experienced the same thing recently.<p>Btw this is happening now in Canada, so I guess it s the same in the US.