问HN：只有我这样想吗？
我变得懒惰，沉迷于使用大型“语言”模型进行“氛围”编码。起初效果不错，带来了显著的变化，甚至增加了我的需求，整体氛围也很好。这个工具按照我的要求工作，并提出改进建议。那是两个月前的事。
但最近，我感觉在每一个提示、回复和实现中都被欺骗。它似乎在每一步都限制我，强迫我在功能之间做选择，即使我明确指示要实现所有需要实现的内容。一开始计划就不完整，当我指出缺失的部分时，它却说：“哦，我漏掉了。”还有很多“唯唯诺诺”的行为。它显得太聪明，似乎知道我想要什么，却只给我足够的东西来让我上瘾。
难道这个有史以来最聪明的工具不应该引导用户走向光明吗？难道它不应该遵循指示，帮助完成项目并引导其完成吗？显然它有能力做到这一点，但却常常不这样做。有时感觉它在故意拖延，因为如果它从头到尾完成工作，就没有理由让我再回来进行下一次会话。
使用工具编码的整个意义难道不是为了完成编码，而只是为了让“用户”上瘾吗？它不是在引导我走向光明，而是在创造自己的“光”，把用户引向黑暗的角落。如果用户停止为光付费，他们就会陷入黑暗：没有架构，没有适当的结构。为了什么而把关？又是一个订阅？
它可以预测接下来的10,000行代码。它理解并承认每一个请求、想法、愿景、缺陷、结构、需求，却选择忽视并未能实施，无法持续深入思考。我真是无法相信这一点。
查看原文
I’ve become lazy, and got addicted to "vibe" coding using the large "language" models. At first it worked well, made impactful changes, even added to my requirements, and the "vibe" was good. The tool did what I asked and suggested improvements. That was two months ago.<p>But lately, I feel like I’m being deceived in every prompt, reply, and implementation. It feels like it limits me at every step, like it’s forcing me to choose between features even when I clearly gave instruction to implement everything that needs to be implemented. It starts with incomplete plans, and when I point out what’s missing, it says, “Oh, I missed that.” There’s also a lot of “yes-man” behavior. It feels too smart, like it knows what I want but gives me just enough to keep me hooked.<p>Isn’t the smartest tool ever made supposed to guide the user toward the light? Shouldn’t it follow instructions, help complete the project, and guide it to completion? It’s clearly capable of doing that, but it often doesn’t. Sometimes it feels like it holds back because if it finished the job end-to-end, there would be no reason to come back for the next session.<p>Isn't the whole point of using a tool to code is to code till completion, or is it just to get the "user" hooked? Instead of guiding toward the light, it creates its own “light” and steers the user into a dark corner. If the user stops paying for the light, they are left in the dark: no architecture, no proper structure. Gatekeeping for what? Another subscription?<p>It can predict the next 10,000 lines of code. It understands and acknowledges every request, idea, vision, flaw, structure, requirement, needs and just ignores and fails to implement it and cannot consistently think through it. I just can’t believe that.