问HN：关于OpenAI与Anthropic的20美元/月套餐，最新的共识是什么？
我只考虑每月20美元的版本。
我过去一年一直在订阅Claude，虽然我真正开始好好使用大型语言模型（LLMs）是在过去几个月。使用Opus时，我每5小时能收到大约5条消息（可能是7000行代码的代码库，比较新），使用Sonnet时更多。后来我取消了这个订阅，因为几乎无法使用，约一周前我订阅了ChatGPT。目前我在使用5.4 High版本，没遇到过限制的问题。但它生成的代码确实“不同”，我需要提前更多地规划。它的计划模式也没有Claude那么精确（没有列出它计划实现的方法存根等），所以我想我可能需要改变与它的工作方式？最后，在正常聊天中，它的输出明显更冗长（当个性设置为高效时），并且速度很快（当设置为思考时），但常常感觉没有我希望的那么全面。
我的问题是：这是一个“你用错了方式”的情况吗？我只是需要适应不同的互动模式？还是其他人也注意到质量上有实质性的差异？理想情况下，我希望继续使用ChatGPT，因为Anthropic的限制几乎不切实际。
查看原文
I'm considering $20/month variants only.<p>I've had a Claude subscription for the past year, although I only really started properly using LLMs in the past couple of months. With Opus, I get about 5 messages every 5 hours (maybe 7k LOC codebase, fairly greenfield); more with Sonnet. I then cancelled that, since its practically unusable and got ChatGPT sub about a week ago. Currently using it with 5.4 High and I haven't had to worry about limits. But the code it produces is definitely "different" and I need to plan more in advance. Its plan mode is also not as precise as with Claude (it doesn't lay out method stubs it plans to implement etc) so I suppose I may need to change how I work with it? Lastly, for normal chats it produces significantly more verbose output (with personality set to Efficient) and fast (with Thinking) but often it feels as though its not as thorough as I'd like it to be.<p>My question; is this a "you're holding it wrong" type of situation, where I just need to get used to a different mode of interaction? Or are others noticing material difference in quality? Ideally I'd like to stick with ChatGPT due to borderline impractical limits with Anthropic.