问HN：一种去中心化的存活证明？
最近，关于开发者去世的帖子在HN上频繁出现，这让我不得不思考不仅是我自己的生命有限性，还有我的数字基础设施以及其他我可能唯一拥有或知道的数字资产/内容（例如，密钥、密码等）的有限性。
似乎如果我们能够设计一种“活着证明”，使其可以进行加密验证，以便于继承过程，那将会非常有用。基本上，这样可以让你的受托人在RUFADAA下执行事务，确实会很方便。
但随后我意识到，这种证明也可以应用于其他情况，比如在你的在线帖子、互动和参与中放置某种“肉的印记”，这也会非常有用——只要它不能被轻易操控（至少不是“轻松”操控）。
“活着证明”当然是一个非常困难（甚至不可能？）的问题……或者说不是吗？我很想知道HN认为可能有哪些可行的解决方案来解决这个显然需要一个好解决方案的问题。
查看原文
Sadly, there have been a fair number of HN posts lately about devs passing away. It's forced me to think about not only my own mortality, but the mortality of my digital infrastructure and other sorts of digital assets/content that ONLY I may own/know (e.g. keys, passwords, etc).<p>Seems like if we could design some sort of "aliveness attestation" - such that it could be cryptographically verifiable for the purpose of a succession process. Basically making it so that your fiduciaries can execute under RUFADAA [1] would be handy for sure.<p>But then it sort of dawned on me that that same sort of attestation could be applied to other situations like placing some sort of "mark of meat" onto your online posts, interactions and engagements could be undeniably handy as well - so long as it couldn't be gamed (at least not, "easily").<p>"Proof-of-Aliveness" is of course a very hard (impossible?) problem to solve ... or is it? Curious what HN thinks could be a viable solution(s) to a problem that so clearly needs a GOOD solution.<p>[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_inheritance#cite_note-11