问HN：实际上可以同时进行多个编码会话吗？
我一直在试图理解人们是如何真正使用像Claude Code这样的工具的，尤其是在看到一些在Twitter上分享的工作流程后。
我大约在去年六月开始使用终端编码代理。我使用Claude Code几个月后，由于体验不佳，转而使用Opencode。我的终端经常闪烁，格式混乱，单个会话甚至会拖慢整个机器。然后在一两个月后，我转向了Pi，并一直在使用它。
奇怪的是，经过这些编码代理，我的工作流程并没有太大变化，仍然非常原始。我提出问题或展示一些想法，讨论方法，让代理编写代码，然后我进行审查和验证。我确实尝试过采用一些人们所说的“高效”工作流程，但对我来说都不奏效。
去年年底，我看到Claude Code的作者Boris分享他如何使用Claude Code。我感到震惊。他同时运行多个会话。我尝试复制这种做法，但没有成功。两个并行会话已经让我感到力不从心。一旦超过这个数量，我的思维在几分钟内就会崩溃。上下文切换非常痛苦，我会在十分钟内迷失自己。
最近我看到他又发了一条推文，谈到如何使用Claude Code中的新功能。我意识到我甚至没有听说过一半的新功能。老实说，我感觉自己有些落后。
我想知道你们是否真的能够有效地运行多个并行会话，并使用所有这些新功能，甚至提高工作效率？还是说这种工作流程只对一小部分人来说是现实的，比如那些自己开发工具的人？
查看原文
I’ve been trying to make sense of how people really use tools like Claude Code, especially after seeing some of the workflows shared on Twitter.<p>I started using terminal coding agents around June last year. I used Claude Code for a few months, then switched to Opencode because the experience was rough. My terminal would constantly flicker, formatting was messy, and a single session could drag my whole machine down. Then after a month or two I moved to Pi and have been using it ever since.<p>What’s strange is that after going through all these coding agents, my workflow hasn’t really changed. It’s still very primitive. I ask a question or show agent some ideas, discuss the approach, let the agent write code, then I review and verify. I did try to adopt some of the “high-efficiency” workflows people talk about, but none of them work for me.<p>Around the end of last year I saw Boris, the Claude Code Author, share how he uses Claude Code. I was shocked. He runs multiple sessions in parallel. I tried to replicate that. It didn’t work. Two parallel sessions already feel like my limit. Once I go beyond that, my brain starts falling apart within minutes. Context switching is painful, I will lose myself in ten minutes.<p>Recently I saw another tweet from him, talking about how to use newer features in Claude Code. I realized I hadn’t even heard of half of them. I honestly feel like I’m falling behind<p>I wonder you guys really running multiple parallel sessions and using all these newer features effectively, and on top of that double your productivity? Or is this kind of workflow only realistic for a small group of people, like those building the tools themselves?