哈维为什么选择了自上而下的企业市场进入策略，而Cursor则采用了自下而上的方式？
我听说人们将Harvey形容为律师的Cursor。我自己从未使用过，但我想它将人工智能直接带入律师工作的地方，以便阅读、撰写和编辑docx文件，这与Cursor在VSCode中处理代码/文本文件的方式类似。
看起来他们的产品并不像Cursor那样可以直接下载使用。我也听说，如果你不是大型律师事务所，预约Harvey的演示会很困难。
这是为什么呢？
这是因为在2023年，LLM模型的能力或成本限制吗？这意味着今天的初创公司可以做出不同的选择？大型律师事务所的运作方式完全不同吗？还是说这是创始人的偏好？
查看原文
I heard people describe Harvey as the cursor for lawyers. i never used it myself but i imagine it brings AI directly to where lawyers work to read, write and edit docx files similar to what Cursor does to code / text files in VSCode?<p>It seems like their product isn't like Cursor where you can just download and play. I also heard people say its hard to book a demo with Harvey if you're not a big law firm.<p>Why is this the case?<p>Was this a capability/cost constraint on LLM models around 2023? Which means today's startup can make a different set of choices? Does big law firms operate in a way that are completely different? Or is this founder's preference?