问HN：我不明白为什么Anthropic要限制使用。
我想了解Anthropic限制某些类型第三方使用的原因，例如OpenClaw。<p>从一个简单的角度来看，更多的使用应该意味着更多的收入，因为客户是按令牌付费的。那么，为什么要限制呢？如果一个第三方产生了大量的使用，这最终不是对收入和增长有利吗？<p>他们还考虑了哪些其他因素是我们不容易察觉的？如果我卖鞋子，我会很高兴地卖出更多，无论下游有多少个转售商。
查看原文
I’m trying to understand the rationale behind Anthropic limiting certain types of third-party usage, e.g., OpenClaw<p>From a naive perspective, more usage should mean more revenue since customers pay per token. So why restrict it? If a third party is generating heavy usage, isn’t that ultimately beneficial for revenue and growth?<p>What other factors are they considering that are not immediately obvious? If I sold shoes, I'd be happy to sell more regardless of how many resellers are down the chain.