HackerNews中文版

Anthropic通过鼓励用户以特定方式使用其软件来给予用户经济奖励。对于那些学习较慢、思考较多、同时处理多项任务的人，当他们在计算机硬件的内存中留下未完成的工作时，会受到惩罚。如果你长时间保持一个窗口打开，它会询问：“你想用代币支付以从磁盘重新加载上下文，还是想从头开始？”并提供一个摘要选项，该摘要是在上下文从缓存中卸载时计算得出的。那些始终如一、专注工作的人，是对服务器硬件寿命和基础设施能力消耗最少的。我想知道哪种方式最有效？当然，工人们更倾向于那种对思维最简单和最具吸引力的方式。我敢打赌，这种偏好取决于个人的思维方式……无论如何，我并不对这是否好坏做出价值判断，我只是想到这一点，并认为某个地方的人应该出于某种原因了解这些。--此外--他们鼓励你使用全屏窗口，专注于思考问题，而不是去查看其他地方。他们通过“自动滚动”功能来实现这一点，当你的鼠标或焦点离开窗口时，这个功能就会触发。这对喜欢交叉引用的人来说非常紧张和烦人。但它确实有助于让你保持专注。如果没有这个功能，常常会感觉像是在一片文字的海洋中游泳——这是因为人们不知道如何使用Pg.Up和Pg.Down键。

查看原文

anthropic financially rewards its users by encouraging them to use their software in a certain way.the slow learners, the thinkers, the multitaskers, they are penalized when they leave open work in the computer hardware's ram. if you leave a window open too long, it asks "do you want to pay in tokens to reload the context from disk, or do you want to start from scratch?" with the option for a summary, which was calculated when the context was unloaded from cache.the people who work consistently and in a focused way are the ones that are cheapest on their server hardware lifespan infrastructure capability. I wonder which path is most effective? Surely the workers prefer the one that is easiest and most engaging for the mind. I bet the preference depends on the mind...anyway I bring no value judgements on if it's good or bad I just thought of that and I thought that someone somewhere should read about that for some reason--also--they encourage you to use a full-screen window and just to think your way through problems instead of looking elsewhere. They do this with the "auto-scroll-down" functionality that triggers whenever your mouse / focus leaves the window. This is very stressful and annoying to people who like to cross-reference. But, it is useful for keeping yourself on task. Without it, it often feels like swimming in a sea of text - this is because people don't know how to pg.up and pg.down.

Anthropic正在塑造我们的思维。