为什么HN社区对人工智能如此反感？
真心想问一下。
在过去的六个月里，我每天查看HN最佳RSS订阅时，都会看到关于AI“写出糟糕代码”、“引入漏洞”、“造成技术债务”或类似内容的帖子。
我可能会因此得罪很多人，但人们是否意识到代码只是实现目标的一种手段？
用户并不关心代码是由AI编写的还是手动编写的，或者你使用了哪个框架。他们关心的是产品是否能正常工作。
我这样说是因为我在软件工程领域已经磨练了超过20年的技艺。
让我们面对现实：当我手动发布产品的1.0版本时，AI辅助的版本可能已经以10倍的速度部署完成。到那时，足够的现实反馈将会浮现出来，以识别主要问题，而像Claude Code这样的工具将使得以惊人的速度修复并发布2.0版本成为可能。
在某些时候，执行速度开始比代码的优雅性更为重要。
查看原文
Genuine question.<p>Over the past six months, there hasn’t been a single day where I’ve checked the HN Best RSS feed without seeing a post about how AI “writes bad code,” “introduces bugs,” “creates technical debt,” or something along those lines.<p>I’ll probably make a lot of enemies by saying this, but do people realize that code is just a means to an end?<p>Users don’t care whether the code was written by AI or by hand, or which framework you used. They care that the product works.<p>I say this as someone who has spent more than 20 years honing their craft as a software engineer.<p>Let’s face it: by the time I manually ship version 1.0 of a product, the AI-assisted version could have been deployed 10x faster. By then, enough real-world feedback would have surfaced to identify the major issues, and tools like Claude Code would make it possible to fix and ship version 2.0 at an incredible pace.<p>At some point, execution speed starts to matter more than the elegance of the code.