问HN：你为什么不会被人工智能取代？
人工智能模型正在迅速提升。公众仍未见识到Anthropic的Mythos模型的能力，而该模型现在已经有4个月的历史。
我看到很多关于某些工作始终需要“人类参与”或某些技能无法被大型语言模型（LLM）替代的论点，但我对这种观点持怀疑态度。似乎如果这些模型的通用智能继续提升，那么每一项工作只需输入正确的上下文，设计合适的结构以便代理进行协作，建立合适的验证循环等，尽管这些都很难实现，但并非不可能。
如果模型的改进在未来三年内继续以目前的速度进行（提醒一下，三年前最好的模型是GPT-4），你真的相信你现在所做的事情不会被一个基于LLM的代理系统做得更好吗？
查看原文
AI models are rapidly getting better. The general public still hasn't seen the capabilities of Anthropic's Mythos model, which is already 4 months old at this point.<p>I've seen many arguments about why certain jobs will always need a "human in the loop", or that certain skills aren't replaceable by LLM's, but I am skeptical of this notion. It seems that if the general intelligence of these models continues to increase, then every job is just a matter of feeding in the right context, designing the right structures for agents to collaborate, having the right verification loops, etc, all of which are difficult to create, but not impossible.<p>If the improvements in models continue at the pace they have over the next 3 years (reminder, 3 years ago the best model was GPT-4), do you really believe that what you do now will not be done better by a system of LLM-driven agentic harnesses?