告诉HN：Claude在生物学方面完全无法使用。
我发现与Claude进行基础生物研究变得非常困难。我并不是在谈论与开发生物武器相关的任何内容，而只是一些简单的免疫学问题，这些问题几乎总是会被标记。
我完全理解设置保护措施的必要性，但在实际操作中，这些措施可能会显著降低该工具在合法科学研究中的实用性。有时我感觉这个模型更适合“随意编码”，而不是作为一个严肃的研究助手。
更有趣的是，你可以将Claude的代码与分子设计模型（如RFdiffusion和Alphafold）结合使用，来开发真正的生物武器，但由于这属于软件领域，这些提示根本不会被标记。这些模型甚至可以在消费级GPU上运行，因此访问的限制几乎不存在。
有没有其他人有类似的经历？
查看原文
I've found that doing basic biology research with Claude has become extremely difficult. I'm not talking about anything remotely related to developing a bioweapon, just straightforward immunology questions that almost always end up being flagged.<p>I completely understand the need for guardrails, but in practice they can significantly reduce the tool's usefulness for legitimate scientific research. It sometimes feels like the model is better suited for "vibe coding" than for serving as a serious research assistant.<p>What's more funny is that you can use claude code together with molecular design models like RFdiffusion and Alphafold to develop a real bioweapon, but since this is in the realm of software, the prompts do not get flagged at all.
Those models can even run on consumer GPUs so the limit of access is almost not there.<p>Has anyone else had a similar experience?