请看Anthropic如何 orchestrate 叙事。
简而言之，自由开源软件（FOSS）是对最大的新经济领域的最大威胁，因此该经济领域所做的一切都应从试图消灭它的角度来看待。
我偶尔会看到一些文章和观点，认为Anthropic在“制造恐慌以提升其AI/ML工具的文化影响力；这是一种暗中宣传的手法”。
如果你的工作是在线上为Anthropic辩护，这确实是一个不错的切入点。这是一个没有实际结果的病毒式话题；这种事情可以在几天内对你的反对者进行认知上的“分布式拒绝服务攻击”。
就我个人而言，我认为Anthropic是在制造恐慌，以便消灭他们最大的竞争对手——自由和开源的机器学习（ML）。包括Nvidia、OpenAI、微软和苹果在内的这些公司，已经在自己的小型机器学习生态系统中投入了数十亿，作为一种亏损引流的策略，目的是让人们和组织在情感上依赖于这项新技术，最终他们会希望对此获得投资回报。而最可能的障碍就是自由和开源模型。免费的开源训练数据和架构使得之前投入市场的数万亿资金变得过时。在过去几十年里，我看到的所有新技术中，机器学习作为自由软件生态系统的一部分，成功的机会最大。这些新出现的万亿富翁们怎么可能允许这种情况发生呢？
查看原文
tl;dr FOSS is the biggest threat to the largest new economic sector, so everything that economic sector does should be viewed through the lens of trying to kill it.<p>I occasionally see articles and sentiments along the lines of, Anthropic is or is not, "scare mongering to boost the perceived cultural impact of their AI/ML tools; a sort of underhanded advertisement".<p>If your job is to defend Anthropic online, it's a good angle to fight from. It's a viral subject with no practical outcomes; the sort of thing that can cognitively DDoS your detractors for days.<p>Personally, I think Anthropic is scare mongering in order to kill their biggest competitor - free and open source ML. These companies, including Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Apple, have invested untold billions into their own little ML ecosystems, as a loss leader, to get people and organizations emotionally dependent on this new technology, and eventually they are going to want ROI for that. The most likely obstacle to that is free and open models. Free and open training data and architecture makes the trillions or whatever previously pumped into the market obsolete. Out of all of the new technologies I've seen over the past couple decades, machine learning has the largest chance of success as a component of the free software ecosystem by a mile. How could any of these new trillionaires allow this to be?