自适应和变异的大型语言模型(LLM)病毒/蠕虫

1作者: rozumbrada大约 4 小时前原帖
我在思考恶意软件和网络蠕虫的未来。我敢打赌,它们将会是自我变异的,并能够根据当地环境进行适应,利用本地模型(一旦这些模型被嵌入到所有设备中,并在未来几年内性能足够强大)。基本上,这几乎就像一种真正的生物体,类似于真实的生物病毒。在这种情况下,大型语言模型(LLM)的非确定性反而成了一种特性。每次感染都可能走上不同的发展路径——一半可能会死亡,另一半可能会存活。可以想象这就像是基因编程,但它是自主的,并且是“加强版”的。对于一些非技术(甚至是技术)人员来说,这让人想起了天网,令人着迷的是,我们正处于一个这样的轨迹上,这种情况突然变得可以想象,并且理论上很快就能实现。 那么,为什么现在还没有发生呢?推理仍然很昂贵,本地模型尚未成熟,因此在大规模应用中没有投资回报。但一旦推理变得像电力或自来水一样便宜且本地化,这将是自然的发展。那么,我们该如何阻止这种传播呢? 现在是否已经有一些文献记录的实验?
查看原文
I am thinking about a future of malware and cyber worms. I bet it&#x27;s gonna be self-mutating and adapting to local environment using local models (once they are built-in to all devices and performant enough in future years). Basically almost a real organism resembling real biological viruses. In this case the non-determinism of LLMs is a feature. Every infection could take its own development path - and half might die, half might survive. Think genetic programming but autonomous and on steroids. For some non tech (even tech?) people this reminds Skynet and it&#x27;s fascinating that we are in a trajectory that this suddenly imaginable and theoretically soon possible.<p>Why is not happening now? Inference is still expensive and local models are not there yet, so there&#x27;s no ROI in making this at scale. But once inference is local and cheap as electricity or running water, this is the natural development. How do we stop the spreading then?<p>Are there already some documented experiments?