问HN：最后一个只有前沿模型才能完成的任务是什么？
我注意到一个反复出现的说法，即开放（权重）模型在技术前沿落后六个月的情况下，对于大多数“工作”来说已经足够。如果你在过去一个月中有过具体的任务，其中 GLM/DeepSeek/Kimi/Qwen 失败而 Opus/Fable/GPT 成功（或者反过来！），请分享一下。
我将提供一个模板，因为我也经常看到有人抱怨缺乏上下文：
- 任务（简短且具体）
- 尝试的廉价模型及其失败原因
- 前沿模型及其是否真正成功
- 事后看来，前沿-1 的模型是否也能满足需求？
查看原文
ive been seeing a recurring claim that open (weight) models 6 months behind the frontier are good enough for the majority of ‘work’. if you've had a concrete task in the last month where GLM/DeepSeek/Kimi/Qwen failed and Opus/Fable/GPT succeeded (or vice versa!), please share<p>Ill provide a template as ive also frequently seen posters complain about a lack of context:
- task (short and specific)
- cheap model tried & how it failed
- frontier model & did it actually succeed
- would frontier-1 have been fine in hindsight?