展示HN:你对Claude Code的使用情况如何?

1作者: Paarthmj5 天前原帖
我与多家公司交流过,它们都有自己的Claude和Codex OTel仪表板,显示每月的支出和使用席位数量。然而,这些仪表板实际上并没有分析工程师如何使用这些工具,以及是否存在改进的空间!这就是我创建<a href="https://www.promptster.ai" rel="nofollow">https://www.promptster.ai</a>的原因。 管理者可以获得代码质量的汇总视图,以及这些与团队工作流程的关联(没有逐个工程师的详细信息)。而工程师则可以获得个性化的指导,帮助他们在保持高产出的同时节省使用令牌。 我们还为个人开发了一个工具,用于测试他们本地的Claude代码设置。这个工具是开源的,完全可以在本地使用。你可以在这里查看:<a href="https://github.com/pa-arth/cc-audit" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/pa-arth/cc-audit</a>。 如果你对这两个工具有任何反馈,或者对购买团队产品感兴趣,请随时联系我!
查看原文
A bunch of companies that I spoke to had their own claude &amp; codex OTel dashboards that showed spend + seats per month.<p>However, none of the dashboards actually analyzed how the engineers worked with the tools and if there were any areas for improvement! That&#x27;s why I created <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.promptster.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.promptster.ai</a>.<p>Managers get aggregate level view of code quality and how that ties with team workflows (nothing on a per-engineer level). While engineers get personalized coaching on how they can save tokens while keeping output high.<p>We also have a tool built for individuals to test their local claude code setups. It&#x27;s open-source and completely local. You can check that out here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pa-arth&#x2F;cc-audit" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pa-arth&#x2F;cc-audit</a>.<p>Would love feedback on either and reach out if you&#x27;re interested in purchasing the teams product!