请问HN：1950年代的芯片行业是如何削弱工会的？人工智能又是如何不这样做的？
在1950年代，芯片行业削弱了少数族裔、移民和女性的地位，并打击了工会。<p>在1960至1970年代，该行业将目标对准了黑人民权组织。<p>与此同时，白人男性被推入管理层，而与业务无关的工作则被拆分成更小的任务。这反过来使公司有了削减薪资的筹码。<p>我不在乎奥特曼所说的ChatGPT在黑箱中做了什么。我根据我所看到的来判断这个世界。现实是，ChatGPT、Claude等工具的实用性和智能水平与团队中最愚蠢、最慢的工程师差不多。<p>另一方面，引入这些工具使工作看起来更“高效”，更像是生产线。工作量增加了，但薪资却停滞不前。<p>现在公司从人工智能中没有获得回报，他们正在削减人工智能的开支，但不要搞错。薪资不会恢复。<p>我错过了什么？我哪里错了？<p>希望能听到对此的看法。
查看原文
In the 1950s the Chip industry undermined minorities, immigrants, women and killed unions.<p>In the 1960-70s it targeted black civil rights groups.<p>Along the way, white men were pushed into management, while anything outside of business was split into smaller tasked jobs. This in return gave companies leverage to cut salaries.<p>I don't care what altman says chatgpt did in a blackbox. I judge the world by what I see. Reality is, chat, claude, etc etc are about as useful as smart as the stupidest, slowest engineer on the team.<p>On the other hand, introducing them has made the job appear more "streamline" more production line like. Work increased, and salaries flattened.<p>Now that companies are not getting returns off of AI, they are cutting AI spending, but make no mistake. Salaries will not recover.<p>What am I missing? How am I wrong?<p>Would love opinions on this