请问HN：人工智能记忆是否存在法律风险？
随着人工智能工具的发展，越来越多的内容被存储，尤其是会议记录，每一次互动都被转录并嵌入供代理人使用作为背景信息。这是否会造成巨大的法律责任？我想在证据披露时，会有大量的数据，包括公司的一些随意评论。
我特别想到像谷歌这样的公司，他们对语言有严格的规定，比如不允许使用“主导”或“杀死”等词汇。如果每次会议都被录音，那么查找这些内容就会容易得多，而如果使用人工智能分析证据数据，可能很难遗漏这些信息。
我没有看到任何产品能够将这些工具或内置功能整合起来，以便清理会议记录。如果你正在进行诉讼，清理记录可能会被视为销毁证据，这样情况可能会更加复杂。
查看原文
With the move with AI tools to storing everything especially meeting notes where every interaction is transcribed and embedded for agents to use as context.<p>Does this not create a huge liability? I imagine in discovery there'd be massive trove of data, including off hand comments the company has.<p>I'm especially thinking of companies like Google who enforce rules on language, like don't say "dominant" or "kill". If every meeting is recorded this would be a lot easier to find and with AI analysing discovery data it'd probably be hard to miss.<p>I don't think I've seen any products that wrap these tools or built in features to sanitise meeting notes, and it might be more complex if you're currently under litigation in which case sanitisation might be counted as destroying evidence?