问HN：还有其他人对品牌停产你最喜欢的日常用品感到厌倦吗？
大家好，
1 我反复遇到同样的问题。当一件商品磨损后，我再也无法购买到完全相同的产品。要么它已经停产，要么在保持相同名称的情况下进行了更改。
2 我想这不仅仅是我的问题。我听说过许多关于人们无法再次购买相同鞋子、T恤、香水或夹克的故事。
3 我理解制造商为什么会这样做。我对他们没有疑问。对我来说，更重要的是我们——顾客，或者说普通人。我开始思考：有什么办法可以支持顾客的选择，让他们能持续多年？
4 这就是我想把软件和硬件工程的概念引入服装行业的原因——长期支持（LTS）和应用程序接口（API）。如果我们冻结标准并对其提供支持，会怎样呢？我们已经有像SATA或CPU插槽这样的东西。为什么不为服装建立类似的概念呢？那么，在与顾客接触的点上，API可以分为一个物理不可变的部分（颜色、材料、设计）和一个灵活的部分（物流、成分）。我们可以从最简单的基础开始——一件T恤。为什么不给它提供LTS支持呢？这个想法是，完全相同的T恤可以销售1年、5年或20年。
5 我的逻辑在哪里出现了问题？我忽略了什么？有没有类似的项目？你会成为这样一家公司的一名顾客吗？
谢谢。
查看原文
Hi everyone,
1 I've run into the same problem over and over again. When an item wears out, I can't buy the exact same one anymore.
It's been discontinued. Or it has been changed while keeping only the same name.<p>2 I assume this isn't only my problem. I've heard many stories about people not being able to buy the same shoes, T-shirt, perfume, or jacket again.<p>3 I understand why manufacturers do this. I have no questions for them. What matters more to me here is us — customers, or simply people. And I started wondering: what could be done to support a customer's choice for years?<p>4 This is where I want to bring concepts from software and hardware engineering into the clothing industry — LTS and APIs. What if we freeze the standard and support it? We already have things like SATA or CPU sockets. Why not build a similar concept for clothing? Then the API at the point of contact with the customer is divided into a physically immutable part (color, material, design) and a flexible part (logistics, ingredients). Let's start with the simplest base — a T-shirt. Why not give it LTS support? The idea is that the exact same T-shirt could be sold for 1, 5, or 20 years.<p>5 Where does my logic break down? What am I overlooking? Are there any similar projects? And would you become a customer of such a company?<p>Thanks.