以低廉的永久纹身价格，获得面试机会。
最近，一场YC创业学校的聚会在LinkedIn上引发了热议。
有7位参与者在YC聚会上选择了纹身。
Lemon Lime邀请了一位纹身艺术家到他们的办公室，任何愿意纹上公司标志的人都能立即获得一次面试机会。最终，有七个人带着永久纹身离开了聚会。
以获得面试机会为条件，要求他人纹身，这显然是不道德的。
问题不在于七位成年人选择了纹身，而在于雇主将职业机会与一个人身体上的不可逆转的改变联系在了一起。
这真的算是“同意”吗？在公司与求职者之间，尤其是在YC这样竞争激烈的环境中，存在着固有的权力不平衡。这使得“同意”远比简单的说“是”要复杂得多。
一家优秀的公司应该根据人才、判断力和品格来雇佣员工，而不是因为他们愿意为了获得面试机会而在自己身上留下永久的标记。
这已经越过了一条界限。而且这是一家YC公司。难道就业市场糟糕到这种地步吗？这竟然是合法的吗？
查看原文
A recent YC Startup School afterparty is making the rounds on LinkedIn.<p>7 people came to the YC after party left with permanent tattoos.<p>Lemon Lime had invited a tattoo artist to their office. Anyone willing to get the company’s logo tattooed immediately received a job interview.Seven people walked away with permanent tattoos.<p>Offering someone a job interview in exchange for getting a permanent tattoo is unethical.<p>The issue isn’t that seven adults chose to get tattooed. It’s that an employer tied access to a career opportunity to an irreversible change to someone’s body.<p>Is it really ‘consent’? There is an inherent power imbalance between companies and job seekers, especially in highly competitive environments like YC. That makes “consent” far more complicated than simply saying yes.<p>A great company should hire people for their talent, judgment and character…not their willingness to permanently mark themselves for a chance at an interview.<p>A line was crossed. And it’s a YC company. Is the job market so awful? How is this even legal?