问HN：这是正常的HN排名吗？
我回来时寻找一篇关于硅谷破坏民主的TechCrunch报道[0]，却惊讶地发现它已经不在首页了。<p>我在第二页找到了它，但它的排名（44）低于那些看似应该排名更高的文章——根据评论数（211）、得分（247）和发布时间（12小时前）。见截图[1]。<p>例如，第38位是一篇<i>较旧</i>的文章，仅有3条评论和29个得分。<p>第41位是一篇<i>显著更旧</i>的文章，仅有38条评论和125个得分。<p>因此，这篇文章的排名甚至低于一篇评论数大约只有一半、得分少约5.5倍的更旧文章。<p>对于文章是否存在其他“奖励”或惩罚（超出HN指南中明显有问题的内容）？<p>[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232221<p>[1] https://imgur.com/a/t4Cn2Fi
查看原文
I came back looking for a TechCrunch story about SV undermining democracy [0], and was surprised to find it had already dropped off the front page.<p>Found it on page 2, but it's ranking was lower (44) than articles that it should seemingly outrank—based on comments (211), points (247) and time posted (12 hours ago). See screenshot [1].<p>For instance, at 38 is an <i>older</i> article with only 3 comments and 29 points.<p>At 41 was a <i>significantly older</i> article with only 38 comments and 125 points.<p>So, this article is ranking lower than even a much older article with roughly half the votes and ~5.5x fewer comments.<p>Is there some other "bonus" or penalty for articles (beyond those that are overtly problematic per HN guidelines)?<p>[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232221<p>[1] https://imgur.com/a/t4Cn2Fi