问HN：你知道有哪些公司回归手写代码吗？
这段内容旨在探讨当前大型语言模型（LLM）热潮周期的阶段，同时也对普通开发者在经济上是否能够不依赖LLM进行现实检验。
你肯定注意到，许多公司已经从“在任何事情上都使用LLM”的政策，转变为限制预算和批准LLM使用范围。看到一些公司可能会决定，快速生成更多代码并没有实质性地促进他们的利润，而选择放弃LLM，转而依赖人工创作，这并不令人意外，但这种情况真的发生过吗？
我并不是想指出新软件开发方式的优缺点，我只是想知道是否有很多公司回归到了旧的开发方式。
查看原文
This is intended as a question about the current phase of the LLM hype cycle, and, at the same time, as a reality check about whether reluctance to rely on LLMs is economically viable for an average developer.<p>You've definitely seen that many companies progressed from "use LLMs for anything and everything" policies to limiting budgets and scopes of approved LLM usage. It wouldn't be unexpected to see that some companies might decide that generating more code faster doesn't meaningfully contribute to their bottom line, and forego LLMs in favour of human authoring, but does it ever happen?<p>I'm not trying to point out any (de)merits of the new way of software development, I simply want to know if there are many/any companies that went back to the old ways.