Ianal：最高法院会重新审视公共场所的隐私权吗？
随着政府监控摄像头的增多，以及个人生活记录设备（如Meta眼镜）的日益小型化，最高法院是否有必要重新审视《美国诉诺茨案》，该案确立了在公共场合没有隐私的原则？<p>公众对摄像头的担忧，尤其是在人工智能的背景下，可能会引发更广泛的反对声音，并促使类似于欧洲隐私法的法律出台。
查看原文
With so many government cameras, and increasingly shrinking personal life-blogging camera devices (i.e. Meta Glasses), might the Supreme Court feel it necessary to reexamine United States v. Knotts, which laid out the in-public, thus no privacy doctrine?<p>The public concern of cameras, now with AI, may lead to a broader backlash against them, and laws akin to privacy laws in Europe.