问HN：关于延迟的MIT/GPL许可证，大家怎么看？
公司保护开源产品不受大型云服务提供商影响的一种方式是限制许可证，禁止某些商业用途，通常是将软件作为服务提供。<p>社区和程序员通常对这些举措几乎总是持反对态度。<p>我看到的讨论中很少提到类似于“在N年后，此许可证变为MIT/GPL”的条款。<p>在我看来，这似乎解决了大部分实际问题，但显然对软件自由或“煮青蛙”问题的关注不大。<p>你同意吗？这样的条款会改变你的看法吗？
查看原文
One way a company can protect an open-source product from large cloud providers is to restrict the license to forbid some commercial uses, typically offering the software as a service.<p>The community and programmers in general almost always dislike these moves.<p>One thing I have seen little discussion of is clauses like: "after N years, this license becomes MIT/GPL."<p>To me, this seems to solve most of the practical issues, while obviously doing little to address software-freedom or boiling-frog concerns.<p>Do you agree? Would such a clause change your opinion?