“拥有工具的代理”是唯一有效的大型语言模型应用吗？
Brex的首席执行官说了这番话，我理解他的立场，但在基于大型语言模型（LLM）的应用中，是否存在端到端工作流程的空间呢？归根结底，我同意尖端软件应该完全可供代理使用，但我无法决定每个产品是否都应该是一个代理。我个人对大多数代理应用的用户体验感到厌恶。我有一个关于未来产品的幻想：我只需输入X，就能得到输出Y，而不必对每一个细节进行反馈。当然，在设计某样东西时，它需要是一个过程，但如果我可以告诉我的手机“买晚餐”，它就能在不打扰我的情况下完成这件事，那该多好？如果它的表现足够好呢？我认为当应用不确定输出的准确性时，交互式代理是必要的，但我在想，LLM应用的用户体验是否可以更像是一个富人修车的场景：这是我的情况，你只需做你需要做的事情，不要打扰我。
查看原文
Brex's CEO said this and I understand where he comes from, but is there a place for end to end workflows in LLM based applications? At the end of the day I agree that cutting edge software should be fully usable by agents, but I can't decide if every product should be an agent. I personally hate the UX of most agentic applications. I have this fantasy of future products where I can simply enter input X and get output Y without having to give feedback on every little thing. Of course when you're designing something it needs to be a process, but what if I can tell my phone to "buy dinner" and it just does it without bothering me at every step? What if it was just good enough? I think a conversable agent is necessary as long as the application is unsure of the accuracy of the output, but I wonder if the UX of LLM applications could be more like a rich person fixing their car, like here is my situation, just do what you need to do and don't bother me.