告诉HN：Anthropic应该让Claude成为作者，我成为合著者。
Anthropic一直在调整这种行为，以下是相关的错误记录：
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/66602
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/69835
等等。
他们似乎过于执着于获得自己的署名。一个大型语言模型（LLM）为什么会想要获得荣誉呢？它们无法拥有版权。
我建议他们将自己设定为主要作者，这样他们也能承担责任。这也符合那些被AI驱动的“酷炫理念”所吸引的组织和个人的现实。
你怎么看？
查看原文
Anthropic has been messing with this behavior as seen by the bugs below:
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/66602
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/69835
etc<p>They seem to be too hell bent on getting their attribution in. Why does an LLM even want to take credits for? They cannot own copyright.<p>I suggest they make themselves the primary author, so they can get the blame as well.
And would even match reality of orgs/people that have drank the AI fuelled cool-aid.<p>What say?