请问HN：3.5英寸软盘读取错误，使用同年代的驱动器会更好吗？
我第一次尝试为我的孩子们恢复1991年学习公司制作的《Spellbound》DOS版，结果并不理想。尽管这些3.5英寸软盘并没有存放在磁性源附近，但仍然出现了读取错误，Linux无法挂载它们。ddrescue提取了数据，但我尚未确认这些数据是否有效。盒子里还有5.25英寸的软盘，但我目前没有可用的读取器，这又是一个独立的项目。
我有一个技术问题，我的USB 3.5英寸驱动器是一个“USB便携软盘驱动器”，是在中国制造的，但没有明显的品牌标识。如果我花时间恢复一个更符合时代的系统，并使用实际的IDE软盘驱动器，它能更准确地读取这些软盘吗？
我的目标是让更多的DOS和早期Windows教育软件能够在我的孩子们身上运行。这个特定的标题对我来说意义重大，因为我自己也曾在很多年前使用过它，并且我还保留着实际的盒子。
一个硬件选择是我父母的Leading Edge WinPro 486。机壳看起来状况良好，但我还没有打开机壳查看电容器的状态。它原生配备了3.5英寸和5.25英寸的驱动器。
查看原文
My first attempt at restoring 1991 Learning Company Spellbound for DOS for my children is dubious. Despite being stored nowhere near magnetic sources, there are read errors on the 3.5 inch floppies and Linux could not mount them. ddrescue extracted data but I have not confirmed it works. The box also have 5.25 inch disks but I do not have a reader online at the moment, that is its own project.<p>My technical question is this, the USB 3.5 inch drive I have is a "USB Portable Diskette Drive" that was Made in China but has no obvious sponsoring branding. If I take the time to bring back to life a more period correct system with an actual IDE floppy drive would it read the disks more accurately?<p>My goal is to get more of this good DOS and early Windows educational software working for my children. This particular title is meaningful because I have the actual boxes and learned on it myself all those years ago.<p>One option for hardware is my parent's Leading Edge WinPro 486. The case looks to be in good shape but I have not opened the case to see the condition of the capacitors yet. It has a natively mounted 3.5 and 5.25 inch drive.