桌面AI助手是否有真正的市场空间，还是已经被解决了？
AGI时代？
现在，我们所拥有的关于这些“监视你的屏幕并为你做事情”的技术，比如GPT-6 Astra、Muse、HeyClicky和Claude Fable 5.1，都是来自AGI时代的最新成果。很有趣的是，大家对这种工具的真实感受是什么。
Astra被描述为来自“AGI时代”，Muse拥有自己的虚拟机，能够读取你的屏幕，填写表单，甚至为你进行谈判，而HeyClicky则是类似的概念，但更小巧，只有一个元素在你的光标旁边，能够与你一起读取屏幕，或根据你的指令启动任务。
那么，这些工具是否解决了你之前遇到的真实问题，还是仅仅是便利的延伸？你们中间有人真正使用过这些工具吗，还是很快就失效了？你对这些工具的能力有什么样的界限定义——如果它能够注释你的屏幕，那完全没问题，但除了这个，你是否希望它不要因目前的不可靠性而主动点击/行动？诚实而直接的回答和看法。
查看原文
AGI era?
So now everything we have on these 'watches-your-screen-and-does-stuff-for-you' tech like GPT-6 Astra, Muse, HeyClicky,and Claude Fable 5.1 is the latest from the AGI era. Interesting to see what do people genuinely feel about this kind of tool.
Astra is described as being from "AGI era", Muse has its own VM and it will able to read your screen, fill out a forms or even negotiate for you while HeyClicky is the same idea but smaller and only one element sitting by your cursor to read your screen with you, or launch a task as per your commands.
So does it solve a genuine problem that you had before or just convenience that was translated into overreach? Has any of you actually put one of these to use, or did it get broken down quickly? And what is your own defined boundary regarding these tools capabilities - would it be completely fine if it annotates your screen, but asides of it, you wouldn't want it to initiate a click/action due to its current unreliability? Honest and direct answers and views.