问HN：为什么账户年龄重要？
当一个人使用单一目的账户或小号，明确是为了掩盖他们的匿名性时，为什么总会有用户攻击他们的新账户，仿佛这个人也是最近创建的一样？<p>这些用户是机器人吗？他们的语言模型真的认为自己在和一个刚创建13分钟的“人”对话吗？<p>我主要想问的是：账户的年龄与所提出的观点有什么关系？一个好的观点就是一个好的观点，一个好的问题就是一个好的问题。<p>更疯狂的是，只要账户足够老，没人会在乎它是否匿名。<p>我从来没理解这一点，看到这么多对话因此而偏离主题，我在想这是否应该成为一条规则：就像人身攻击一样，任何涉及账户年龄的论点都是一种逻辑谬误。
查看原文
When a person posts from a single purpose account or a sock puppet for the precise reason of obscuring their anonymity, why does some user always attack them for having a new account as if they <i>the person</i> was also created recently?<p>Are these bots whose LLMs actually think they are talking with a person that is 13 minutes old or whatever?<p>My main question is: What does the age of the account have to do with the point being made? A good point is a good point. A good question is a good question.<p>What’s even crazier is nobody cares if the account is anonymous as long as it’s old.<p>Never understood that one, and I see so many conversations derailed by it that I wonder if it should be a rule: Like ad hominem attacks, any sort of argument involving the age of the account is a logical fallacy.