一个代码库获得了3,278个星标，同时GitHub显示Andrej Karpathy为贡献者。
一个GitHub仓库在一周内获得了3,278颗星，单日最高达到573颗星。与之相关的论文在Hugging Face的热门论文榜单上也达到了第一名。在此期间，该仓库页面显著展示了@karpathy（安德烈·卡帕西）作为贡献者，包括他的GitHub账户/头像。相关的提交是由@karpathy创建和提交的。GitHub的API显示该提交没有签名。后来，一个GitHub问题对此表示质疑，称卡帕西从未做出贡献。该项目随后删除了该提交。伪造Git提交作者元数据是一个已知问题。有趣的是，这些元数据是如何被GitHub显示为可见的贡献者身份，以及这在特定情况下可能发挥的作用。
参考链接：
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/issues/8
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/commit/4606e68
https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.17906
查看原文
A GitHub repo gained 3,278 stars in one week, peaking at 573 stars in a single day. Its associated paper also reached #1 on Hugging Face Trending Papers.<p>During that period, the repo page prominently showed @karpathy (Andrej Karpathy) as a contributor, including his GitHub account/avatar.<p>The associated commit was authored and committed as @karpathy. GitHub's API shows the commit was unsigned.<p>A GitHub issue later questioned this, saying Karpathy never contributed. The project subsequently removed the commit.<p>Forging Git commit author metadata is a known issue. What's interesting here is how that metadata was surfaced by GitHub as a visible contributor identity, and what role that may have played in this particular case.<p>Refs:
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/issues/8
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/commit/4606e68
https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.17906